Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-5143323-20180113035227/@comment-24024415-20180315172857

Phantom of Ra wrote:
If this thread dies for a month, it WILL die for the rest of the period before its closure, and what will happen then is unknown. Then, confusions will occur.

There are still tons of stuff to discuss about rather than just this "temporary" stuff or "OK or not OK" voting thingy itself. This topic isn't something to be abandoned.

Well that's completely contradictory, either stand by you not knowing what will happen or guess what will happen in the future, not both! Anecdote is a thing you know.

But that shouldn't devalue those issues in the slightest, as they did hold a lot of merit as flaws in the system. Plus, yet again, low atendence rate for supporting side to help resolve those issues fully. But if you want new points to discuss, that's all fine by me.

This system is so secretive that it is genuinely difficult to see the wikia changing in any significant way. This is supported by the sheer lack of posts and threads noting changes that are occuring, if any, alongside the covert nature of the system and the lack of communication those in-members continue to perpetuate, OR The system has shown no progress to actually improving the standards of the wikia, serving only to cause dissonanace to those out of the know. This is supported by the sheer lack of visible changes in the Forums, as having only a handful of wikia-relavent discussions across all the branches since the startup of this system smells of ineffectivity in promoting changes of any type or completely covert.

There. Eitehr way you slice it, inactivity among all the branches and the lack of notifications for changes as a whole area truly unhealthy traits to merit. So increasing in-group notifications for out-group members to help any changes be both discussed healthily and integrated into the system more explicitely by having the common dude know that the changes are present in the first place.